My Photo

About Mike


Subscribe to Mike's Blog

Subscribe to Postings

To Receive a Daily Email of new Postings
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Read My Posts via RSS feed
 


Join the Conversation
Subscribe to Comments

To Receive a Daily Email of Comments on Posts
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Join the Conversation (Comments RSS Feed)
 AddThis Feed Button

Site Search





Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License.


Recognition


My photos on
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from Mike Schaffner. Make your own badge here.


Powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2006

Rankings

  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • Technology Blogs - Blog Top Sites
View blog authority

« Put me in, coach - I'm ready to play today | Main | Using Grandma's Quilt to Explain Your Systems Environment »

May 07, 2007

Letting Users Set the Business Tech Agenda

A couple of items in a  recent article at Information Week called "IT Departments Will Set Less Of The Business Tech Agenda, Survey Suggests" caught my attention. 

"Business users want more innovative software faster and will bypass the IT department if necessary to get it."

"In some cases, the research also shows IT organizations turning a blind eye when business units take risks with smaller, more innovative approaches to software."

No doubt this is a worrisome trend for many in IT.  We sit back and say sure the centralized, integrated approach may take a little longer but if we do it we can have better information, we can have a more complete insight to our customers, we can . . ., we can. . ., we can . . .

Frogs_mstresbabett_2 What this brings to mind is the old riddle about 4 frogs sitting on a log. 

Q. Four frogs are sitting on a log.  Three frogs decide to jump off.  How many frogs are left on the log?

A. Four frogs.  Deciding to do something and actually doing it are not the same thing.

Likewise, software that can provide what is needed is not the same as software that does provide what is needed.

To me that is the key reason why our customers go with the alternative, non-standard solutions.  They get what the need/want from them while the centralized systems never seem to live up to their promise.  Somewhere along the line we've lost the user involvement and commitment to developing the solution as we envisioned it.  Perhaps we truly never had them.

To me the key to getting and keeping our users involved revolves around a number of things.

  1. The system must meet their immediate needs
  2. The system must provide results throughout the development cycle not just at the end of a long process
  3. It must provide results quickly - we need "early wins"
  4. The fully integrated end state must tie in with the customer's vision of how they will operate in the future
  5. The process is driven by the customer's needs not IT's

If we can't do these things I believe our customers will go for the short term alternatives that do even if they don't meet the long term needs.  What are your thoughts on this?

"Frogs" photo by mstresbabette

If this topic was of interest, you might also like these:

Tell a Friend       View blog reactions       

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/1102168/18264096

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Letting Users Set the Business Tech Agenda:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In





Recommended Books



This is the personal blog of Michael W. Schaffner. The opinions expressed in this blog are soley mine and those of commenters. You should not infer that these opinions are the opinion of or have been endorsed by any current or former employer.
Copyright 2006, 2007, 2008 Michael W. Schaffner       You may copy or quote sections of this blog if you provide an attribution consisting of a reference to the Michael Schaffner and ''Beyond Blinking Lights and Acronyms" along with a hyperlink (if a web reference) to the blog posting.     
Creative Commons License 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License.